|
Utah's Water Resources: Planning for the Future CHAPTER 4 - Page 2 of 4 |
|
|
![]() |
|
In order to receive the full benefits of water conservation, Utah needs to implement water conservation measures and programs now, rather than wait for a crisis. State and local leaders recognize the importance of water conservation to effective resource planning and management. They also recognize the need for local water planners and managers to customize their water conservation objectives to local needs and circumstances. This is evident in the legislative requirement for water retailers and conservancy districts to prepare individual water conservation plans. In order to meet the future water needs of its growing population, particularly in urban areas, Utah will need to continue to refine and improve its water conservation plan requirements and actively promote research and implementation of effective water conservation programs and measures. Utah's Water Conservation Goal The goal of the state is to conserve water wherever possible. Because most new water demands will be the result of an increasing population, the state has developed a specific goal to conserve water use directly linked to population growth. This goal is to reduce per capita water demand from public community systems by 12.5 percent by 2020 and a total of 25 percent before the year 2050. This is equivalent to a total decrease in demand of about 400,000 acre-feet per year by the year 2050. Figure 10 illustrates the important role that 25 percent conservation can play in reducing M&I water demands throughout Utah by the year 2050. For example, without water conservation, it is estimated that the Jordan River Basin would experience an increase above current demand of about 320,000 acre-feet per year by 2050. With conservation, this increase is cut nearly in half. The figure also shows that most basins still have a fairly large gap, representing additional needed water supply, even after conservation. Although it may be possible to achieve more than 25 percent conservation, it is likely that most of these additional needs will be met by a combination of agricultural water conversions, improved management of existing supply and water development. In 1998 and 1999, the Utah Legislature passed and revised the Water Conservation Plan Act. This act requires conservancy districts and water retailers with more than 500 connections to prepare a water conservation plan and submit it to the Division of Water Resources. This requirement covers systems that service about 93 percent of Utah's population. As of June 2001, 99 out of 150 water retailers and conservancy districts who were supposed to submit plans have done so. These plans are to be updated and resubmitted every five years. State water funding boards have further stipulated that a plan must be in place prior to any funds being awarded. The legislation also directs the Board of Water Resources to study ways to implement the plans, develop recommendations on implementation, and report to the Legislature.1 This legislation has given water conservation increased emphasis to many water providers as well as significant media coverage throughout the state, and has created a foundation upon which the state can build a successful water conservation framework. This framework took initial shape in the recommendations that the Board of Water Resources made to the Legislature in November 1999. Some of these recommendations are summarized below:2
Funding for research and implementation of local water conservation programs and measures is needed to complement the requirements of the water conservation plans. Accurate and reliable results of water conservation measures in Utah need to be collected in order to determine those measures that will most likely produce positive results. This will encourage a broader acceptance of water conservation by local decision-makers and allow for a better allocation of resources to achieve water conservation goals. One data need that is critical for a water provider to monitor the success of water conservation measures is the determination of an accurate baseline water use. This typically includes all M&I uses except for self-supplied industries, private domestic, and other non-community systems. This baseline is usually expressed as gallons per capita per day (gpcd). The Division of Water Resources has determined the total per capita water use of all public water supplies, including secondary water, to be approximately 321 gpcd. Only Nevada (the driest state in the U.S.) uses more water per capita. While Utah's relatively high per capita water use is often compared to the national average of approximately 179 gpcd, a more appropriate comparison would be against other Rocky Mountain states. This average is approximately 245 gpcd.3 Figure 11 breaks down Utah's total per capita use of public supplied water into residential, commercial, institutional and industrial components. Residential use is by far the largest component at about 66 percent or 213 gpcd. As shown on the right, an estimated 143 gpcd, or 67 percent of this amount, is used outdoors and 70 gpcd (33 percent) is used indoors. Institutional uses, which include schools, churches, parks, cemeteries and city-owned properties, are about 55 gpcd. Commercial uses are approximately 39 gpcd and industrial uses (public supplied only) are approximately 14 gpcd. |
||||
|
||||
| Although these statewide values provide useful information for comparison purposes, individual communities should establish their own baseline use rates. This will assist these communities in setting appropriate goals and monitoring the progress toward reaching those goals through the various conservation measures and programs they decide to implement. |
![]() |
|
CHAPTER 4 - WATER CONSERVATION Utah’s Water Conservation Effort |
|
|
|
Home -
Acknowledgements -
Preface -
Table of Contents -
Executive Summary Chapter 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - 7 - 8 - Notes - Glossary - Index Text Only - PDF File - Slide Show - Trivia |